DOK+Depth+of+Knowledge

= DOK Depth of Knowledge = =Math Depth of Knowledge = =Reading Depth of Knowledge = 

=Science Depth of Knowledge =

=Social Studies Depth of Knowledge = = =

=Vocational Depth of Knowledge = 



According to Norman L. Webb, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research (“Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas,” March 28, 2002), “interpreting and assigning Depth-of-Knowledge Levels to both objectives within standards and assessment items is an essential requirement of alignment analysis. Four levels of Depth-of-Knowledge are used for this analysis.” Norman Webb’s “Depth-of-Knowledge Levels for Four Content Areas” include: Language Arts (Reading, Writing), Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies.

A general definition for each of the four (Webb) Depth-of-Knowledge is provided. Webb recommends that large-scale, on-demand assessments in reading should only assess Depth-of-Knowledge Levels 1, 2, and 3. Depth-of-Knowledge at Level 4 in science should be reserved for local assessment only.


 * Descriptors of DOK Levels for Science ** (based on Webb and Wixson, March 2002)

//** Level 1 Recall and Reproduction **// requires recall of information, such as a fact, definition, term, or a simple procedure, as well as performing a **simple** science process or procedure. Level 1 only requires students to demonstrate a rote response, use a well-known formula, follow a set procedure (like a recipe), or perform a clearly defined series of steps. A “simple” procedure is well-defined and typically involves only **one-step**. Verbs such as “identify,” “recall,” “recognize,” “use,” “calculate,” and “measure” generally represent cognitive work at the recall and reproduction level. Simple word problems that can be directly translated into and solved by a formula are considered Level 1. Verbs such as “describe” and “explain” could be classified at different DOK levels, depending on the complexity of what is to be described and explained.

A student answering a Level 1 item either knows the answer or does not: that is, the answer does not need to be “figured out” or “solved.” In other words, if the knowledge necessary to answer an item automatically provides the answer to the item, then the item is at Level 1. If the knowledge necessary to answer the item does not automatically provide the answer, the item is at least at Level 2.

//** Level 2 Skills and Concepts **// includes the engagement of some mental processing beyond recalling or reproducing a response. The content knowledge or process involved is **more complex** than in level 1. Items require students to make some decisions as to how to approach the question or problem. Keywords that generally distinguish a Level 2 item include “classify,” “organize,” ”estimate,” “make observations,” “collect and display data,” and “compare data.” These actions imply **more than one step**. For example, to compare data requires first identifying characteristics of the objects or phenomenon and then grouping or ordering the objects. Level 2 activities include making observations and collecting data; classifying, organizing, and comparing data; and organizing and displaying data in tables, graphs, and charts.


 * Some action verbs, such as “explain,” “describe,” or “interpret,” could be classified at different DOK levels, depending on the complexity of the action ** . For example, interpreting information from a simple graph, requiring reading information from the graph, is a Level 2. An item that requires interpretation from a complex graph, such as making decisions regarding features of the graph that need to be considered and how information from the graph can be aggregated, is at Level 3.

//** Level 3 Strategic Thinking **// requires deep knowledge using reasoning, planning, using evidence, and a higher level of thinking than the previous two levels. The cognitive demands at Level 3 are **complex and abstract**. The complexity does not result only from the fact that there could be multiple answers, a possibility for both Levels 1 and 2, but because the multi-step task requires **more demanding reasoning**. In most instances, requiring students to explain their thinking is at Level 3; requiring a very simple explanation or a word or two should be at Level 2. An activity that has more than one possible answer and requires students to justify the response they give would most likely be a Level 3. Experimental designs in Level 3 typically involve more than one dependent variable. Other Level 3 activities include drawing conclusions from observations; citing evidence and developing a logical argument for concepts; explaining phenomena in terms of concepts; and using concepts to solve non-routine problems.

//** Level 4 Extended Thinking **// requires **high cognitive demand** and is **very complex**. Students are required to make several connections—relate ideas //within// the content area or //among// content areas—and have to select or devise one approach among many alternatives on how the situation can be solved. Many on-demand assessment instruments will not include any assessment activities that could be classified as Level 4. R.A.F.T. strategy for writing RAFT is a writing strategy that helps students understand their role as a writer and how to effectively communicate their ideas and mission clearly so that the reader can easily understand everything written. [] [] [] []